Mason said in slow, level tones, "Your Honor, that remark was uncalled for and unnecessary. I hold in my hand a subpoena to appear before the Grand Jury, a subpoena which very apparently was held in the hands of a deputy sheriff and could have been served at any time prior to the convening of court. Yet that paper was served at a signal from the district attorney, and purely for the purpose of letting the Court and the spectators know publicly that I was being called as a witness before the Grand Jury. It was merely a grandstand play."

Judge Winters hesitated a moment, and Burger, turning belligerently to Perry Mason, said, "I see you can dish it out, but you can't take it."

Judge Winters banged his gavel.

"That will do, Mr. District Attorney," he said. "There will be no further personal remarks of that nature, and I can assure Counsel for the defense that the Court will not allow its decision to be influenced in the slightest by the comments of Counsel. Proceed with the case, gentlemen."

Perry Mason, holding the subpoena in his hand, turned to scan the faces of those in the courtroom. He caught the anxious, startled eyes of Della Street on the outskirts of the crowd. She raised a newspaper in her hand and gestured with it significantly.

Perry Mason nodded his head almost imperceptibly and then flashed her a swift wink.

"Your next witness," Judge Winters said to the district attorney.

"George Purley," Burger announced.

As Purley was taking the oath, Burger turned to Mason and said, "Purley's reputation as a handwriting expert should be too well known to require formal qualification. He has been with the police department for years and…"

"I'll stipulate Mr. Purley's qualifications, subject to the right to crossexamine," Mason said.

Burger nodded perfunctory thanks and turned to the witness.

"Your name is George Purley, and you are now and for some time past have been employed as a fingerprint and handwriting expert with the police department?"

"Yes, sir."

"On the fourteenth of this month did you have occasion to go to the house of Hartley Basset?"

"I did."

"I will ask you generally if you noticed the body of the man who lay on the floor of the office in the Basset residence."

"I did."

"Did you notice a portable typewriter on the table near that body?"

"I did; yes, sir."

"Did you notice a piece of paper on which typewriting appeared, and which was in the typewriter?"

"Yes, sir."

"I show you this piece of paper and ask you whether that is the same piece of paper."

"It is."

"Did you make tests to determine whether the typewriting on this paper was written by the machine in which the paper was found?"

"I did."

"What did those tests show?"

"They established conclusively that the typewriting was not done by that machine, but was, in fact, done by another machine that we subsequently found in the house."

"Where?"

"In the bedroom of Mrs. Basset, one of the defendants in this case."

"Did she make any statements in your presence as to, the ownership of that machine?"

"Yes, sir."

"What did she say?"

"She said that it was her machine and that she used it for her private correspondence; that occasionally she typed her correspondence personally and occasionally had one of her husband's stenographic assistants type the correspondence."

"Did she mention anything about her qualifications as a typist?"

"Yes, sir; she said she had been a professional typist for years and used the touch system."

"What is meant by a touch system?"

"A system of typing in which the operator does not look at the keys of the typewriter, but strikes entirely by a sense of touch."

"Is there anything about this typing by which you can tell whether the person operating the machine used a touch system?"

"Yes, sir; a certain evenness of touch by which all of the keys were struck with approximately the same force. In the socalled twofinger system or huntandpeck system, because the pressure is less mechanical, the keys are struck with varying force and there is a very slight difference in the impression made by the type upon the paper."

"In your opinion, Mr. Purley, this paper was written upon a machine other than the one in which it was found and by a person using the touch system. Is that right?"

"Yes, sir; beyond any possibility of doubt this document was typed upon the Remington Portable which was found in Mrs. Basset's bedroom. In my opinion it was typed by a person who used the touch system and who was, or at least had been at some time, a professional typist."

"Crossexamine," Burger said briefly.

"If I understand the testimony correctly," Mason said, "this paper was typed upon the machine which was subsequently found in Mrs. Basset's bedroom. After it was typed, it was taken to the room where the body was found, and inserted in the typewriter. Is that correct?"

"Yes, sir."

"Thank you," Mason said. "That is all."

Judge Winters made a note in his notebook, nodded his head to Burger and said, "Your next witness, Counselor."

"Arthur Colemar," Burger announced.

Colemar came forward, took the oath, and slid into the witness chair, his gray eyes blinking as though he were slightly bewildered at his surroundings.

"Your name's Arthur Colemar?"

"Yes."

"What's your occupation, and by whom were you last employed?"

"I was Mr. Hartley Basset's secretary, sir."

"How long had you been employed by him?"

"For three years."

"When did you last see him?"

"On the fourteenth of this month."

"Was he living or dead?"

"Dead."

"Where was he?"

"In his inner office."

"How does it happen that you saw him there then?"

"I had been to a show. I returned to find the house in confusion. People were running about, apparently very much excited. I inquired the cause of the trouble, and was informed that Mr. Basset was dead. Someone took me into his office so that I could identify him."

"I think," Burger said, "that I have already proven the corpus delicti, so I won't go into the matter of death by this witness at any greater length. I desire to show by this witness certain other facts."

Judge Winters nodded. Mason, sitting sprawled in his chair, his legs thrust out in front of him, said nothing.

"You are, of course, intimately acquainted with the defendant, Mrs. Sylvia Basset."

"Oh, yes, sir."

"Mr. Basset has his office in his house?"

"In the same building, yes, sir. It had originally been designed, I believe, as a duplex dwelling, or as a four flat building, I don't know which."

"And Mr. Basset had the east side of the building for his office?"

"The lower floor on the east side, yes, sir."

"Where did you sleep?"

"I slept upstairs in the back part of the house."

"Where did you work?"

"In the part Mr. Basset had set aside for his office."

"Did you have occasion, from time to time, to talk with Mrs. Basset?"

"Frequently."

"Did you ever have an occasion to converse with her concerning the amount of life insurance Mr. Basset was carrying?"

"Yes, sir."

"When was that conversation?"

"Objected to as incompetent, irrelevant, and immaterial," Mason said.

"Overruled," snapped Judge Winters, his countenance cold as granite.

"Your Honor," Burger said, "I intend to prove motive by this witness. I feel that I am within my rights, and…"

"The objection has been overruled," Judge Winters said. "Moreover, this Court will never sustain an objection that such a question is not material. Experience shows that the motive of gain is one of the most compelling motives in murder cases. If the prosecution can establish this as a motive, it is undoubtedly entitled to do so."