He, who showed you the “History’s password” – an axe, which is really useful for John the Baptiser’s tragedy causes understanding (though he himself provoked this tragedy) – seemingly doesn’t know that this person’s face is similar to the cartoon of the last USSR Minister of Defence – Marshal Yevgeny Shaposhnikov.

— As I know, Marshal Dmitri Yazov was the last Minister of Defence who joined GKChP in August 1991, – interrupted Paolo.

You’re right, Paolo. Yazov really was the last Minister of Defence before the Putsch. But immediately after it the General Secretary Gorbachev returned from Foros and appointed Air General Shaposhnikov to be the last USSR Minister of Defence, after what he gave him a rank of marshal. So the air force was to play the role of blind axe cutting down the towers in Moscow or in New York. The last depended on where the ruling matrix would turn. At least in 1992 this climber and upstart dealt the finishing blows to the Soviet Army that even after the great power’s destruction was still strong and unified, and thus were very dangerous for the West and for the USSR and Russia partition as well. And who knows, may be under other circumstances he could do much more evil. And somebody else on his place could save the armed forces unity and the unity of the state and we’d have another history…

Well, let’s continue. When I was talking of the matrix methods of ruling explained by my friend from Russia I told, that when some alternative conception of ruling appears however all matrix symbols and images remain unchanged. And all the evil planned in matrix-scenario can be realized but towards those who has planned it.

So do you think that God is unable to clear the adversarial matrixes from evil? – Asked Paolo again.

That, what is called God’s Providence, always shows itself in the mutually enclosed matrixes action. It’s harder to understand how it happens. Any matrix is filled by people’s thoughts consisting of images and their own energetic. Thoughts could be vicious or righteous and are the reflection of people’s sense of proportion. Vicious thoughts could be expressed by righteous words, but this doesn’t make them righteous. American government wanted to punish Iraq and Yugoslavia but told about the charity and mercy. Kamikaze terrorists wanted to punish America and told about the righteous retribution. Today the USA is going to punish the terrorists and carry out an anti-terrorist operation against Afghanistan with a code name “Operation Infinite Justice”. Though, it was their own words that fifteen of nineteen terrorists were Saudi nationals. This words: justice, revenge, mercy are understood as something good and righteous. I mean that the good and righteousness of any thoughts is expressed not by words, but by deeds instead. “…He is not the God of disorder but of peace[57]”. This Gospel’s phrase tells that God isn’t somehow connected to people’s evil. He wished the good dominated between people. But he gave the right of choose to people. And it means that a human (if he is human indeed) should exterminate the evil between humans himself. This way the Almighty can use only one way to assist the evil’s extermination: not to prevent any evildoers from destroying other scoundrels thus clearing the place for the righteous ones.

Andrew, you’re always talking about the alternative conception of ruling. But you hold back the today’s dominating conception. Or have I wrongly understood?

I thought, Mr. Holmes, that it’s no need to discuss the existing conception since all of us, at least on the West, live under it. Thus we don’t take it as the conception of ruling, like a child doesn’t know about the air he’s breathing. For me the today’s conception is Bible and the culture born by it with their conceptual and terminological systems. Today this culture is near to dominate over the whole world because of the technologies created by it. And it doesn’t matter what other cultures think of it. Radio, television, car, plane rocket, modern ship – all of this is the production of the biblical culture under the mask of Christianity-the-result-of-history. The Arabian world with its Islam, Japan with its Shinto, China with Confucianism or India with Hinduism can shame and defame West culture. But they just aren’t able to manage without its technocratic attributes, applying which they “erode” their own cultures via the unconscious people’s perception of western technical “toys”. And I even don’t talk about the technologies of their creation, which other countries are trying to become proficient in. Whether they like it or not, but this is a one-way process. You’d ask me why? If other cultures have no defence against the biblical culture, you wonder? I can easily say: no they don’t. And this is because though they seem to be quite different they have something common, what unites them – the crowd-“elitism”. One can endlessly discuss advantages and disadvantages of Christian, Judaic, Islamic, Shinto’s, Hinduism’s, Confucian and even Marxian or scientological crowd-“elitisms”, but a crowd-“elitism” will remain a crowd-“elitism” until any alternative will appear. But this alternative should be not just a dream of ideal life of everybody on the Earth. There were enough of such dreams and one can see it in different tales, legends, songs or ballads. At first it should consist of a harmonious system of views on every part of crowd-“elitist” society’s life expressed in certain words.

And do you consider such an alternative to exist already? –Holmes asked?

Yes, it exists in Russia, and its symbol one can see at the third “picnic”.

Do you mean this laughing child in a washbasin?

You’re quite right, Mister Holmes. And that’s why bearded Marx seized his head in horror. It exists for ten years and is called the Conception of Social Security. In Russian it has an abbreviation COB or COBa – it was Stalin’s pseudonym in the first years of his revolutionary activity. One French journalist has told: “Stain didn’t become a thing of the past; he has dissolved in our future”[58]. Today one can say that he has crystallized back, though not as a single person. But… a person, so to speak, called by the conception matrix can appear. May be there will be many persons. You know, Stalin just proclaimed Marxian slogans, but ruled in compliance with some expediency. And very this expediency was the conception of ruling in images, on the basis of which worked Stalin. It wasn’t expressed in words but it has created its own culture. When in the last year they bring 37 soviet films of Stalin’s times and of the sixties to New York all the elite cinema critics told: “This is some alien civilization!” That’s why people from Russia who expressed this matrix in certain words consider that the appearance of the conception alternative to the biblical was predetermined as the alternative to the suicidal crowd-“elitism”. This conception has the proper name – “Dead Water”[59].

Through this title the stable relation to Russian folk epos, which tells about the dead and live waters, is maintained in the conception. According to Russian tales and legend a hero cut by enemies at first is washed with the dead water and his body grows together and knits. And then he is washed with the live water and he returns to live. Look at the second “Defence Picnic”. There is a tale “Three sons”. It tells about two brothers attempting to revive the third, killed by enemies. And here, – Andrew showed the phrase on the bottom, – is said of the “live water” being searched by brothers, and not a single word about the “dead water”. The tale is reprinted from “Modern Russian Tales” collection, which belonged to the Trotskyites magazine “Ogonyek” library. Why did the authors of “picnic” forget of the “Dead water” symbolism? On August 5, 1991, when “Chas Pick” with the “Defence Picnic” was published, the conception with epic title “Dead Water”, which had been the first to express precisely and definitely the alternative to the crowd-“elitism”, had already existed. The active process of forming the terminological and conceptual systems on its basis actively went on, and therefore an aggregor of its followers formed. The alternative aggregor behaviour algorithm distortion – or scientifically: the introducing the hidden inversions to the algorithm – is one of the meanings of the collective intellect. To wash a dead body with the live water without the dead one means to revive stumps, i.e. to revive a freak, cripple, probably even a monster. So the negative reaction on the “Dead Water’s” symbolism is just a defence of crowd-“elitism” against the alien alternative conception invasion. And this stereotype is very stable in our society. It exists as long as the crowd-“elitism” itself exists.